I saw a related question.....so now I am wondering.
I guess that progressive and repeated damage to the brain would have to result in some physical failures (or partial failures) somewhere too. It is highly unlikely that vascular dementia would only kill brain cells in just those areas not directly involved in automatic body functions. So...
But, I wonder. Not all forms of dementia are the results of on going and continuous new damage to the brain....could it then be a cause of death at all?
We hear of people living 5, 7, even 10 years with this diagnosis. Seems like it is slower than prostate cancer if it is a cause of the ultimate death.
11 Answers
Helpful Newest
First Oldest
First
My Dad had sundowers, on his death certificate it was "aspiration pneumonia" as the main cause, with "dementia" listed as secondary cause.
I am still knee deep in doing the family tree to see if any other older generations had the same issue. Was only able to find some very old death certificates, most mentioned heart issues on my Dad's side of the family, which made sense. Had one saying "patient was paranoid" which I bet probably was dementia.
ADVERTISEMENT
For example, if there were a nice clear video of the disease my husband had, it would show new "Lewy bodies" showing up here and now there and again over there -- in no apparent pattern. Symptoms depend on where the bodies appear and if they damage the neurons they touch. The picture of the brain would look very different than the Alzheimer's brain, but they both progress, each in its own way, throughout the brain. The ultimate outcome is death in both of them.
I looked at a few abstracts of scholarly articles about vascular dementia. (You might want to do that too.) Here are a few things of interest:
1)"Unlike Alzheimer's Disease, which weakens the patient, causing them to succumb to bacterial infections like pneumonia, vascular dementia can be a direct cause of death due to the possibility of a fatal interruption in the brain's blood supply."
2) A study that compared progress of impairment in persons with no dementia, with Alzheimer's, and with Vascular dementia. It involved about 1,000 subjects and lasted 30 months. I think the study was in Canada. The conclusion: "Most people with VCI show readily detectable progression by 30 months. Depressive symptoms were more common and more progressive in VCI than in Alzheimer's disease, whereas clinical evidence of progressive executive dysfunction was common in both AD and VCI."
3) Another study with about 200 subjects including Dementia with Lewy Bodies, lasting a year, and conducted in 2001 came to this conclusion: "Over 1 year, DLB, VaD and AD patients had similar rates of cognitive decline overall."
Vascular dementia does progress. The picture of the brain would be very different than the AD brain in the video. But it would be similar in that something detrimental is happening in various parts of the brain as the disease progresses. The actual cause of death is different than AD or LBD, but the disease progression ends in death.
You say that "Not all forms of dementia are the results of on going and continuous new damage to the brain." What makes you think that? I think that all progressive dementia types involve ongoing and continuous new damage to the brain.
Me personally, I'm a proponent of knowing as much as I can about my family health history. My mom refused to seek medical attention during a decade-ish-long slide of weakness, severe balance issues and cognitive/personality changes.
When mom died in her home (as a direct result of her self-neglect), I ordered an autopsy. To the tune of almost $5,000. That was shocking.
Learned the hard that in my state, autopsy is only "routine" (a.k.a. free) if someone dies under suspicious circumstances or in a university teaching hospital.
Still glad I did it, but wow.
I understand the manner of the continuous brain damage from alz.
I was talking just about dementia. Dementia from TIA or vascular. Or even now this new report showing a close relationship to blood thinners and developing dementia. None of which are ALZ.
My husband's death certificate says he died of Lewy Body Dementia. The autopsy report had more specific causes, basically complications of LBD. It also said it was amazing he hadn't died of heart problems and he probably would have very soon.
He lived about 10 years with LBD. The loved ones of members of my support group lived 18 months to 11 years. Keep in mind that the disease does not start when we see symptoms but has been gradually developing in the brain for years.
So ... if my husband had died of heart problems a day before the dementia took him, then that would be on his death certificate and that is not a complication of LBD.
But basically, yes, dementia is a terminal condition, ultimately resulting in death. Other conditions could be the cause of death, just depending on timing.
Let me know what you think of that 3 minute video.