Are you sure you want to exit? Your progress will be lost.
Who are you caring for?
Which best describes their mobility?
How well are they maintaining their hygiene?
How are they managing their medications?
Does their living environment pose any safety concerns?
Fall risks, spoiled food, or other threats to wellbeing
Are they experiencing any memory loss?
Which best describes your loved one's social life?
Acknowledgment of Disclosures and Authorization
By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or ConsumerFeedback@aplaceformom.com to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
✔
I acknowledge and authorize
✔
I consent to the collection of my consumer health data.*
✔
I consent to the sharing of my consumer health data with qualified home care agencies.*
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
Mostly Independent
Your loved one may not require home care or assisted living services at this time. However, continue to monitor their condition for changes and consider occasional in-home care services for help as needed.
Remember, this assessment is not a substitute for professional advice.
Share a few details and we will match you to trusted home care in your area:
I have worked with both and the families people with DD would never exclude them from planning meetings but the elderly even when they are lucid are not included in meetings when they are in AL.
Wow, Sassy. WRONG ALF is all I can say. My brother's ALF had meetings once a week. It was an interesting concept. Residents had cottages that had average 14 rooms around a main lobby that was community room on one end with TV, games and etc. and dining room on other end with games, meals, snacks. There were always problems so much so my bro teased it was like living in a 60s commune again. This one wants the shades drawn because of glare. That one wants them up to do puzzles, play games. And on you go.
They had community meetings led by the cottage monitor once a week. All complaints got aired. All questions asked and answered. It worked well, tho admittedly often without a solid answer.
Now on to your basic question. You are absolutely CORRECT and even under the LAW. The disabled, even mentally disabled, have more rights. And stronger lobbies!
Take for instance a mentally disabled person. It takes something massive to get them declared incompetent and in need of guardianship. A judge once said about an unsafe hoarder who was quite out of control "It's not against the law to be insane". Those with mental disabilities are not, unless a danger to self or others, given even a checkup. And if a 5150 hold is done they will be held only long enough to put them on a medication; which often they will not continue when released. As to developmental disabilities, I do think they sometimes have better support, but that may be state dependent, or family dependent. Not certain. Overall I would say that the elderly when they fail have fewer rights. Just my opinion.
My mother had zero interest in being included in meetings at AL! All she wanted was for me to make decisions FOR her, and then pitch a fit if things didn't go her way, expecting ME to make it right! The AL would've been fine allowing mom to attend meetings, it was SHE who didn't want to.
In Memory Care Assisted Living, residents do not attend care meetings for obvious reasons.
Or are you referencing an experience with only 1 AL? If so, then I don't think you can make such a generalization, especially if you don't know the elders personally. Sometimes they seem "lucid" and maybe are, but have other problems that prevent them from participating in their care decisions. It took us a long time to figure out my MIL's short-term memory problem (and we saw her a lot since she lived close to us). The social worker told us it was called called Apparent Competency. We could include her in the meetings, but she wouldn't remember critical things and would keep asking the same questions, and getting upset, thus making the meetings less productive (or unproductive). This is where my 95-yr old Mom is at right now. All the neighbors think she's "sharp as a tack" but she isn't. If she gets between me and a service tech, she just makes things harder.
This is my grandmother too - to the rest of the world she seems spot on - but when the chips are down - it's pretty clear that there is cognitive decline and that she struggles to put important things together. She'll laugh and make a joke when she tries to use the walker backwards, or the wrong end of the fork and it seems endearing to people who aren't around her all the time - but when you are the caregiver (my mom) you know it's not just those one or two little things - it's "death by a thousand papercuts" so to speak.
Having an adult son with a hypoxic brain injury from a complex medical condition, I’d say very few have tried over the years to monitor his “rights” or include him in plans for his education or other aspects of his care. It’s mostly gone directly to us as parents though he’s capable of speaking for himself in many instances. I also witnessed my elderly dad essentially losing his voice, figuratively speaking. He remained of sound mind his whole long life, but definitely became increasingly dismissed, talked over, and ignored. He was often treated as the goofy old man who was good for entertainment. Though he had valid points and interesting things to say, few wanted to listen. It was hard to watch. There are other cultures in the world who value the elderly, the US is not one of them for sure. And often, it’s our loss
So perhaps a little bit of perspective - and maybe this isn't the case for everyone - but it is the case for more than you may realize.
My youngest DD has both Autism and and ADHD-C. Her Autism is fairly mild. She is fully competent and likely will be able to be independent with some interventions. But she does want me to participate in most things WITH her that deal with anything that she might not fully understand as a young adult, anything that might require her to remember things specifically. Obviously - she is never excluded from anything that has to do with her own choices because she has autonomy. I'm just along for the ride. If she had SIGNIFICANT delays though, that situation might be different, in that while she might be present, she might not be offering a lot of input to the conversation and decision making - and in that case- we would need to have the legal right to make decisions for her.
My FIL was considered competent. I cannot recall a single care plan meeting - both in rehab and in the SNF - that he was NOT invited to. HE chose not to attend. In the cases where we had to have the meeting in a conference room - someone would always go to his room to get him - he would REFUSE to attend. And in the case where the meeting was held in his room - he would tune it out entirely. There was one meeting during which he told us we were too loud and tried to turn the tv up. We reminded him each and every time that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss HIS care - he ALWAYS said he knew and that he didn't care. At one point we considered just not even telling him that the meetings were occurring - but it was actually better to have it on record that he knew and refused to attend.
Why do families of the elderly exclude them from planning meetings, while the families of people with developmental delays don't? I don't know that it is universal. There is no way that I would ever leave my DD out of a discussion about her future, but she actively participates and wants to be involved. My FIL not only didn't care, he didn't want to be involved and refused to participate.
I think it depends entirely on the person, their stage of delay or lucidity, and ultimately whether they want to be involved or not.
This is a tough question to answer. It really depends on the individual circumstances. Don’t you think? Both can be very challenging.
I can tell you that my mother often said that she felt like she was not seen as an older person.
I will give you an example of what I mean. Mom asked me to accompany her in the doctor’s office because she couldn’t hear very well.
Mom was afraid that she would miss something important that the doctor said if I wasn’t in the doctor’s office with her.
Well, the doctor would see me, and address questions to me about my mom as if she wasn’t even in the room.
So, I politely told the doctor to please ask my mother his questions instead of asking me. I also said that if he needed me to clarify something that I would.
Mom appreciated that I spoke up for her because from then on, he did directly her questions.
Mom could lip read very well and there usually wasn’t an issue with her understanding his questions.
Even at my age, 68, I have found that sometimes a salesperson in a store will often wait on a younger customer first. I realize how my mother felt when she said that old people are often overlooked.
By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington.
Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services.
APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid.
We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour.
APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment.
You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints.
Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or ConsumerFeedback@aplaceformom.com to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights.
APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.
I agree that:
A.
I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information").
B.
APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink.
C.
APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site.
D.
If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records.
E.
This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year.
F.
You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
My brother's ALF had meetings once a week. It was an interesting concept. Residents had cottages that had average 14 rooms around a main lobby that was community room on one end with TV, games and etc. and dining room on other end with games, meals, snacks. There were always problems so much so my bro teased it was like living in a 60s commune again. This one wants the shades drawn because of glare. That one wants them up to do puzzles, play games. And on you go.
They had community meetings led by the cottage monitor once a week. All complaints got aired. All questions asked and answered. It worked well, tho admittedly often without a solid answer.
Now on to your basic question. You are absolutely CORRECT and even under the LAW. The disabled, even mentally disabled, have more rights. And stronger lobbies!
Take for instance a mentally disabled person. It takes something massive to get them declared incompetent and in need of guardianship. A judge once said about an unsafe hoarder who was quite out of control "It's not against the law to be insane". Those with mental disabilities are not, unless a danger to self or others, given even a checkup. And if a 5150 hold is done they will be held only long enough to put them on a medication; which often they will not continue when released.
As to developmental disabilities, I do think they sometimes have better support, but that may be state dependent, or family dependent. Not certain.
Overall I would say that the elderly when they fail have fewer rights. Just my opinion.
In Memory Care Assisted Living, residents do not attend care meetings for obvious reasons.
Or are you referencing an experience with only 1 AL? If so, then I don't think you can make such a generalization, especially if you don't know the elders personally. Sometimes they seem "lucid" and maybe are, but have other problems that prevent them from participating in their care decisions. It took us a long time to figure out my MIL's short-term memory problem (and we saw her a lot since she lived close to us). The social worker told us it was called called Apparent Competency. We could include her in the meetings, but she wouldn't remember critical things and would keep asking the same questions, and getting upset, thus making the meetings less productive (or unproductive). This is where my 95-yr old Mom is at right now. All the neighbors think she's "sharp as a tack" but she isn't. If she gets between me and a service tech, she just makes things harder.
I also witnessed my elderly dad essentially losing his voice, figuratively speaking. He remained of sound mind his whole long life, but definitely became increasingly dismissed, talked over, and ignored. He was often treated as the goofy old man who was good for entertainment. Though he had valid points and interesting things to say, few wanted to listen. It was hard to watch.
There are other cultures in the world who value the elderly, the US is not one of them for sure. And often, it’s our loss
My youngest DD has both Autism and and ADHD-C. Her Autism is fairly mild. She is fully competent and likely will be able to be independent with some interventions. But she does want me to participate in most things WITH her that deal with anything that she might not fully understand as a young adult, anything that might require her to remember things specifically. Obviously - she is never excluded from anything that has to do with her own choices because she has autonomy. I'm just along for the ride. If she had SIGNIFICANT delays though, that situation might be different, in that while she might be present, she might not be offering a lot of input to the conversation and decision making - and in that case- we would need to have the legal right to make decisions for her.
My FIL was considered competent. I cannot recall a single care plan meeting - both in rehab and in the SNF - that he was NOT invited to. HE chose not to attend. In the cases where we had to have the meeting in a conference room - someone would always go to his room to get him - he would REFUSE to attend. And in the case where the meeting was held in his room - he would tune it out entirely. There was one meeting during which he told us we were too loud and tried to turn the tv up. We reminded him each and every time that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss HIS care - he ALWAYS said he knew and that he didn't care. At one point we considered just not even telling him that the meetings were occurring - but it was actually better to have it on record that he knew and refused to attend.
Why do families of the elderly exclude them from planning meetings, while the families of people with developmental delays don't? I don't know that it is universal. There is no way that I would ever leave my DD out of a discussion about her future, but she actively participates and wants to be involved. My FIL not only didn't care, he didn't want to be involved and refused to participate.
I think it depends entirely on the person, their stage of delay or lucidity, and ultimately whether they want to be involved or not.
I can tell you that my mother often said that she felt like she was not seen as an older person.
I will give you an example of what I mean. Mom asked me to accompany her in the doctor’s office because she couldn’t hear very well.
Mom was afraid that she would miss something important that the doctor said if I wasn’t in the doctor’s office with her.
Well, the doctor would see me, and address questions to me about my mom as if she wasn’t even in the room.
So, I politely told the doctor to please ask my mother his questions instead of asking me. I also said that if he needed me to clarify something that I would.
Mom appreciated that I spoke up for her because from then on, he did directly her questions.
Mom could lip read very well and there usually wasn’t an issue with her understanding his questions.
Even at my age, 68, I have found that sometimes a salesperson in a store will often wait on a younger customer first. I realize how my mother felt when she said that old people are often overlooked.