She said as soon as she was appointed Guardian, my aunt decided, even though we were told she had mild dementia, that she wanted to die and planned to starve herslef. My cousin thinks this is fine and plans to let her go along with it. She does not want to involve Hospice and just says "let God's will be done, if she doesn't eat, I can't force her." Is this abuse. Doesn't my cousin have the legal obligation to at least notify the Court this is going on? Help!
But I guess I do believe it is her choice whether to eat or not to eat. After all the 'homework' is done she has to at least help herself or not. And, well, none of us eventually are getting out of here alive.
As far as the court is concerned, the guardian, is suppose to help the person, (not go along with some idea, of a mild dementia patient?) usually a guardian gets appointed when the person is declared disabled....and the guardian eventually has to answer to the court...how does she plan on getting away with it? Your cousin, is assisting someone in suicide, it is only suicide if self-inflicted, other wise it is a homicide.
If this is a for real situation, your duty is to report her... this is done by making an emergency order to the court, or reporting her to senior abuse, etc. you could ask the question of the senior abuse hotline, if someone is allowing their mother to starve because the mother wants to starve or...is allowing someone to starve senior abuse or die by starving is something, that a guardian should be allowing their ward to do and from there, the decision would be in their (Senior Abuse Hotline's) hands.
My father decided when he had terminal kidney cancer that if he needed to
starve himself he would . To me that was his choice as he dealt with a terminal
and painful condition. He said that he had a friend that did that with terminal
cancer. He ended up not doing that , but he needed hospice service for his
last month.
My mother has had dementia for five years- and it may be Altzheimer's- but she
is a scleroderma patient and takes strong medicine. She has a sweet and
cheerful demeanor most days, so she is able to bring a smile to others. Her
life contiues to be valuable, and she does have to take an antidepressant to
be able to have her personality continue though it is diminishing.Discussing these topics with health professional and/or mental health professional together with your cousin to give you some other perspectives on the situation.
Blessings to you and your family.
And so take her to a Doctor&get things done so she is saved.!
I wish you and your family...peace.
Perhaps you aunt does not want to face the phases she is going to go through and she has a right to make that decision as well.
I do not believe this is a legal situation, but a family decision. I am sorry but this is personal and if you involve legal counsel everyone of you will lose your rights and the courts will take over.
I will just say this my father had severe brain damage after a heart attack, we had to decide if he was going onto a feeding tube or if we were going to do what they call comfort care, which is basically starving the body. As a family we discussed it and made our decision. In turn, I gave the order to the doctor.
So I am sorry having been down a similar path, I disagree with taking the legal step, you need to discuss it. Your aunt and her family need to discuss it and make a decision that you can live with. This is a moral and ethics situation, not a legal situation.
I look forward to learning what the authorities say. If the Guardian is not open to learning, THAT's when I'd be concerned. In the meantime, helping find the options and the understanding of the Aunt's plight is the way to go, IMO.